Though each firms provide all sorts of internet hosting providers, they’re most well-known for his or her entry-level shared internet hosting providers. At first look, it’d look like there’s not a lot to separate Bluehost and SiteGround; nonetheless, by the point you’ve completed studying this comparability, you’ll know precisely the place every host excels and what their drawbacks are.
That will help you make a closing determination on whether or not to decide on SiteGround or Bluehost, this comparability contains efficiency exams that present how briskly web sites hosted by Bluehost and SiteGround load, what number of guests they’ll deal with directly, and what kind of uptime ranges you possibly can count on.
Whether or not you want a number for a brand new web site otherwise you’re considering of transferring your current web site elsewhere, this Bluehost vs SiteGround comparability will assist you to resolve who to enroll with.
Table of Contents
- Bluehost vs SiteGround Shared Hosting Plan Particulars
- Bluehost Shared Hosting Plan Particulars
- SiteGround Shared Hosting Plan Particulars
- Bluehost and SiteGround Promotional Costs
- SiteGround vs Bluehost Characteristic Comparability
- WordPress Web site and Account Backups
- Caching and Optimization
- WordPress Administration Options
- Web site Staging Instrument
- Consumer Help
- Bluehost vs SiteGround Efficiency Exams
- Bluehost and SiteGround Load Time Testing
- Light-weight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
- Bluehost Light-weight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
- SiteGround Light-weight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
- Light-weight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes Abstract
- Heavyweight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
- Bluehost Heavyweight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
- SiteGround Heavyweight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
- Heavyweight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes Abstract
- SiteGround vs Bluehost Loading Occasions Abstract
- Load Dealing with Check Outcomes
- Light-weight Theme Load Check Outcomes
- Heavyweight Theme Load Check Outcomes
- Bluehost vs SiteGround Load Dealing with Check Abstract
- SiteGround vs Bluehost Uptime Monitoring
- Bluehost vs SiteGround Technical Particulars
- Remaining Ideas
Price isn’t the whole lot in the case of selecting an online host, however it’s a very good place to start out.
So earlier than we get to the location velocity and cargo dealing with check outcomes, right here’s a fast overview of the costs of the Bluehost and SiteGround shared internet hosting plans and what you get on your cash:
On the time of writing, Bluehost have a few of the lowest priced shared internet hosting plans round, with beneficiant storage provisions and unmetered bandwidth to accommodate limitless web site guests and visitors:
- Fundamental: from $3.95/mo for 1 web site with 50 GB of storage.
- Plus: from $5.95/mo for limitless web sites with limitless storage.
- Alternative Plus: from $6.95/mo for limitless web sites with limitless storage plus a CodeGuard Fundamental subscription.
- Professional: from $13.95/mo for limitless web sites with limitless storage plus a CodeGuard Fundamental subscription and a devoted IP.
Whereas there’s limitless storage and unmetered bandwidth, you continue to have to remain throughout the phrases of the utilization insurance policies or Bluehost will take “corrective motion”; nonetheless, for many small web sites, complying shouldn’t be an issue.
On the subject of the SiteGround shared internet hosting plans, at first look the upper costs and decrease storage limits make the cheaper Bluehost plans seem like the higher possibility. Nevertheless, don’t decide simply but. By the top of this evaluate, you’ll know whether or not or not it’s value paying further.
Like Bluehost, the SiteGround shared plans under embrace unmetered visitors; nonetheless, in line with SiteGround, every plan is appropriate for a set variety of guests every month:
- StartUp: from $6.99/mo for 1 web site, 10 GB of storage, and appropriate for ~10ok month-to-month visits.
- GrowBig: from $9.99/mo for limitless web sites, 20 GB of storage, and appropriate for ~20ok month-to-month visits.
- GoGeek: from $14.99/mo for limitless web sites, 40 GB of storage, and appropriate for ~100ok month-to-month visits.
If you happen to’d prefer to know extra, our information to the SiteGround internet hosting plans may also help you resolve which one is greatest on your web site.
Whereas SiteGround do provide unmetered visitors, the really helpful month-to-month guests determine ought to provide you with an concept of which plan is perhaps best suited on your present or anticipated viewers dimension.
As a result of approach sources are allotted to those plans, in case you host your web site on the StartUp plan, for instance, and it receives greater than 10,000 month-to-month visits, it’d begin experiencing efficiency points, akin to sluggish web site velocity or web page load errors.
Nevertheless, the month-to-month go to tips aren’t arduous limits, so it actually relies on the sources your web site consumes, quite than how many individuals truly go to it. When you’ve signed up with SiteGround, you possibly can monitor your utilization ranges by way of your account space.
Bluehost and SiteGround Promotional Costs
With each hosts, you get a deep low cost in your first bill, which may cowl as much as 36 months of internet hosting. As soon as that interval is over, you’ll pay the complete worth going ahead.
So earlier than you select a plan, don’t simply have a look at the promotional charges. You’ll want to try the complete costs listed on the Bluehost and SiteGround plan pages to see how a lot you’ll should pay as soon as your first billing cycle is over.
Verdict: Based mostly on simply the numbers, Bluehost seems like the higher possibility, each when it comes to worth and storage on your web site(s). Nevertheless, the opposite variations between the SiteGround and Bluehost shared internet hosting providers, together with efficiency, options, and person expertise will probably be explored in the remainder of this comparability.
SiteGround vs Bluehost Characteristic Comparability
With pricing out of the way in which, it’s time to take a look at the options which are included on the Bluehost and SiteGround shared internet hosting plans.
Though you may simply have a look at the characteristic lists on the SiteGround and Bluehost web sites, in some circumstances, these two hosts implement the identical options in numerous methods. One instance is web site backups, with one host supplying you with the flexibility to create backups on demand, whereas the opposite doesn’t (relying on which plan you select).
Because of this, it’s value doing a little bit of analysis to search out out which host delivers their options in a approach that will work greatest for you.
So with that in thoughts, let’s begin with an summary of how backups work with each Bluehost and SiteGround.
WordPress Web site and Account Backups
Whereas your web site and account will probably be mechanically backed up on all SiteGround shared internet hosting plans, with Bluehost, it’s solely the highest two plans (Alternative Plus and Professional) on the shared internet hosting tier that embrace backups. For these prime two plans, the backups are added by way of a bundled CodeGuard subscription.
Nevertheless, with Bluehost, you possibly can add the backup instrument to the Fundamental and Plus plans in case you pay further for a CodeGuard subscription. With costs beginning at $2.99 a month, this does make the month-to-month price of the cheaper plans fairly a bit costlier.
Whereas all the SiteGround plans embrace computerized backups, the bottom priced StartUp plan doesn’t allow you to create backups on demand. That characteristic is reserved for the costlier GrowBig and GoGeek plans.
Verdict: A backup system is a necessary a part of operating an internet site, so SiteGround wins right here because of every day computerized backups included on each shared plan as commonplace. Nevertheless, you may at all times set up your individual alternative of free backup plugin and handle this your self in case your Bluehost plan doesn’t have this characteristic.
Caching and Optimization
Website velocity and quick loading occasions are very important for delivering a constructive person expertise to your guests, in addition to making your web site an efficient gross sales or lead technology instrument.
With that in thoughts, it’s good to see that each Bluehost and SiteGround take this significantly. Not solely do they each boast high-performance servers of their advertising and marketing supplies, however additionally they offer you some further instruments and performance to extend web site efficiency.
In a while in our comparability, you’ll discover the outcomes from our impartial efficiency exams of our websites hosted by Bluehost and SiteGround.
Nevertheless, earlier than we get to that, let’s discover what effort each hosts have taken to ship a quick internet hosting expertise.
In addition to in-house caching know-how, you can even rapidly allow the Cloudflare CDN service from inside your account areas with each hosts. As Cloudflare has free and paid plans, this is usually a cost-effective strategy to optimize your WordPress web site.
Each hosts add an in-house plugin to your WordPress web site which supplies you with some instruments for optimizing the efficiency of your web site. Nevertheless, with Bluehost, all you possibly can actually do is select from the three ranges of caching.
With the SiteGround SG Optimizer plugin operating in your web site, you can’t solely configure how your web site is cached but additionally implement different options, akin to atmosphere, entrance finish, and media optimization.
Whereas organising the check websites for this comparability, SG Optimizer actually did cut back the file sizes of the pictures that had been uploaded to WordPress Media Library with none detectable loss to their high quality when it transformed them to the WebP format. Because of this, it’s nice to see this characteristic included as commonplace on the SiteGround shared internet hosting plans.
In comparison with Bluehost, SiteGround actually offer you much more instruments and choices for optimizing your web site and hopefully enhancing its efficiency.
These further optimization instruments from SiteGround do imply that you just’ll should take a bit extra of an energetic function in the case of configuring your web site. It might contain a little bit of trial and error, too.
Nevertheless, the aim of all the SiteGround instruments is clearly defined that will help you make the suitable choices.
Helpfully, there’s additionally a tab within the SG Optimizer space of your WordPress dashboard that permits you to rapidly see what the Google PageSpeed Insights instrument thinks of your efforts, with options of issues to implement if there’s room for enchancment.
With Bluehost, your choices are extra restricted, because it’s actually only a case of selecting a caching degree and deciding whether or not to allow the CDN integration or not. This method is extra easy however doubtlessly reduces your skill to optimize your web site until you put in third-party plugins.
Nevertheless, the loading time exams later on this comparability will shed some mild on whether or not the Bluehost or SiteGround optimization options and method delivers the very best outcomes.
Verdict: SiteGround wins right here as they provide you extra methods to optimize your web site for sooner loading occasions.
WordPress Administration Options
One potential draw back of selecting lower-priced shared internet hosting over costlier managed WordPress internet hosting is that it’s important to tackle extra of the obligations of operating an internet site.
Nevertheless, issues have gotten a lot better for shared internet hosting prospects on this space now. Subsequently, whether or not you select Bluehost or SiteGround, you’ll get entry to computerized WordPress software program and plugin updates.
Bluehost additionally has a couple of different management-related settings, akin to the flexibility to disable feedback on previous posts, setting the variety of content material revisions doable, and emptying the content material trash at set intervals, all by way of your account portal.
Like Bluehost, SiteGround will mechanically replace your WordPress software program for you. Nevertheless, in contrast to with Bluehost, there’s no strategy to decide out of this.
With SiteGround, you possibly can delay updates, however just for as much as 72 hours. This provides you little time to check if the newest model of WordPress is appropriate together with your web site configuration, together with the plugins you’ve put in or any customized code you’ve added to your web site.
In contrast to with Bluehost, you possibly can’t allow computerized theme updates on your SiteGround-hosted web site. Though doing so won’t be a good suggestion as updating a theme might unintentionally change the way in which your web site seems, relying on the way it’s been configured. In reality, most updates are value testing earlier than making use of to your reside web site.
Verdict: As Bluehost offers you the choice of disabling computerized WordPress software program updates, it wins right here.
Web site Staging Instrument
If you wish to safely check modifications to your web site, akin to putting in a brand new model of WordPress or a plugin, a staging instrument may also help.
When you’ve used the instrument to create a staging web site that solely you and your crew can entry, you possibly can check out new software program, code, or the rest, with out your guests having the ability to see it. When you’re prepared, you possibly can push these modifications to your reside web site.
The power to create a staging web site was as soon as reserved for the shoppers of managed WordPress internet hosting, however now, Bluehost and SiteGround make it out there on their way more reasonably priced shared internet hosting plans. Nevertheless, there are some variations between the Bluehost and SiteGround staging options.
Each hosts have finished an ideal job of conserving issues easy, and it solely takes one click on to create a staging model of your web site. When you’ve created a staging web site, you possibly can change to it from inside your dashboard with Bluehost or your account space with SiteGround.
Then whenever you’re prepared, you possibly can switch the contents of the check web site to the reside web site, once more in just some clicks.
One of many essential variations between the 2 instruments is that with SiteGround, you are able to do a partial switch. This might embrace transferring solely chosen information and/or database tables.
With Bluehost, this feature isn’t out there, and it’s solely doable to switch the whole web site. The benefit of the SiteGround method is you could keep away from overwriting any modifications which have been made to the reside web site when you had been engaged on the staging web site, such because the addition of a brand new publish or person feedback.
SiteGround additionally enables you to create a number of staging websites, whereas with Bluehost you possibly can solely have separately.
Verdict: Having the ability to create a number of staging environments for every reside web site and the flexibility to decide on which information and/or database modifications to switch make the SiteGround staging characteristic the winner.
Ought to something go unsuitable together with your web site, it’s important you could rapidly get in contact with somebody. Subsequently it’s nice to see that each SiteGround and Bluehost present 24/7 entry to their help employees.
Nevertheless, whereas each hosts have reside chat and phone help channels, SiteGround additionally provide help by way of e-mail tickets. Additionally, points raised by prospects on the top-level SiteGround GoGeek plan are assigned with precedence to probably the most skilled help brokers for an additional fast decision.
Verdict: Each hosts provide responsive 24/7 help, however SiteGround wins right here as a consequence of providing an e-mail ticketing channel alongside chat and telephone help.
That covers the principle options of the Bluehost and SiteGround shared internet hosting plans. As you possibly can see, each hosts offer you most, if not all, of the necessities wanted to run a steady WordPress web site.
In a while on this comparability, you’ll discover a guidelines of the principle technical particulars of the 2 providers that ought to reply some other questions you might need.
However earlier than we get to that, let’s discover the outcomes from our exams to see whether or not SiteGround or Bluehost delivers the very best efficiency.
Bluehost vs SiteGround Efficiency Exams
For our efficiency exams, we first monitored the loading occasions of our websites, then we used a load testing service to see how they dealt with a number of digital customers accessing them on the identical time.
Listed below are the outcomes…
Bluehost and SiteGround Load Time Testing
For the loading time exams, our WordPress web sites had been monitored by the paid Pingdom service over a seven-day interval. Their velocity was recorded by Pingdom at 30-minute intervals to ascertain a median loading time.
Light-weight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
For our first web site velocity check, we created two an identical WordPress web sites utilizing the light-weight Twenty Twenty theme. Pingdom monitored an an identical web page, which contained a picture and a few textual content, from every web site.
Bluehost Light-weight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
As proven within the graph under, after seven days of monitoring, the common loading time for the location hosted by Bluehost was 1.17 seconds in line with Pingdom.
SiteGround Light-weight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
For the identical check, however for the location hosted by SiteGround, the common loading time was a a lot sooner, and really spectacular, 289 milliseconds.
Light-weight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes Abstract
As you possibly can see, the location hosted by SiteGround was round 4 occasions sooner than the identical web site hosted by Bluehost.
If you happen to plan to make use of a light-weight theme, then our check outcomes present that you just’d expertise a lot sooner loading occasions by internet hosting your web site with SiteGround.
In reality, based mostly on the outcomes from our earlier opinions, even more-expensive managed hosts weren’t in a position to serve a light-weight theme a lot sooner than SiteGround, together with Liquid Internet (358 milliseconds) and WP Engine (246 milliseconds).
You may discover that the location hosted by SiteGround was monitored by Pingdom from Europe whereas the location hosted by Bluehost was monitored from Western US. These testing places had been chosen as a result of the SiteGround web site was hosted in Europe whereas the Bluehost web site was hosted in Western US, making certain that each websites had been examined from the Pingdom location nearest to them.
Heavyweight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
If you happen to don’t wish to use a light-weight theme like Twenty Twenty that doesn’t include many inbuilt options, we additionally examined the loading occasions of two an identical websites utilizing the feature-rich multipurpose Avada theme.
For these exams, we imported the Company demo and monitored the pre-built homepage structure, which comprises movies, animations, and a number of photographs.
Bluehost Heavyweight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
The bigger dimension and extra advanced design of the web page being examined resulted in a sluggish common load time of 4.85 seconds for the location hosted by Bluehost.
SiteGround Heavyweight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes
As soon as once more, SiteGround delivered a a lot sooner common load time than Bluehost, coming in at 1.69 seconds for the location utilizing the heavyweight theme.
Heavyweight Theme Velocity Check Outcomes Abstract
As our exams present, neither SiteGround nor Bluehost might serve the Avada Company homepage structure in lower than one second.
Nevertheless, in case you do plan to make use of any such theme and its prebuilt content material, you’d be a lot better off selecting SiteGround over Bluehost.
Based mostly on our earlier exams, you’d have to enroll with a premium managed internet hosting service, akin to Kinsta or WP Engine, to get sooner loading occasions when utilizing a heavyweight theme.
SiteGround vs Bluehost Loading Occasions Abstract
In all of our Pingdom web site velocity exams, SiteGround carried out a lot better than Bluehost. So whether or not you intend to make use of a light-weight theme or a heavyweight possibility, paying further for SiteGround will guarantee a sooner loading web site.
If you happen to’re searching for an reasonably priced host that’s nearer in worth to Bluehost however has sooner loading occasions, then you need to try the velocity exams from our current HostGator evaluate.
Load Dealing with Check Outcomes
As our check websites don’t obtain any visitors, the above exams don’t inform the complete story.
We additionally must understand how effectively websites hosted by Bluehost and SiteGround deal with a number of guests accessing them directly.
So to search out this out, we used the paid K6 (previously Load Affect) service to simulate an growing variety of guests accessing them on the identical time.
For these load dealing with exams, we instructed K6 to ship a number of digital customers to a web page on our check websites over a five-minute interval. K6 recorded the response occasions of the websites to see what influence the simultaneous digital customers had on their efficiency.
Listed below are the outcomes…
Light-weight Theme Load Check Outcomes
First, we examined our websites that had the light-weight Twenty Twenty WordPress theme put in. For this check, K6 was set to extend the variety of digital customers visiting a web page on the location from one to 99 over a five-minute interval.
The location hosted by Bluehost was examined first, and the chart under exhibits the outcomes.
As you possibly can see, whereas there’s some variance within the blue line — which represents the response time — it doesn’t ever exceed 300 milliseconds, and when 99 digital customers are accessing the location on the identical time, the response time is a formidable 84 milliseconds.
The following chart exhibits the outcomes from the identical check however for the location hosted by SiteGround. This time, the response time (blue line) is extra steady than within the Bluehost web site check, though when 99 simultaneous digital customers are accessing the location, the response time is 168ms. Nevertheless, that is nonetheless a really respectable efficiency.
As our outcomes present, whether or not you select SiteGround or Bluehost, and you employ a light-weight theme, you shouldn’t expertise any points with as much as 99 guests accessing your web site as soon as. That does, nonetheless, depend upon what these customers are doing in your web site and what kind of content material they’re accessing.
Heavyweight Theme Load Check Outcomes
For the subsequent exams, the heavyweight Avada theme was used, and the response time of the homepage imported from the Company demo was monitored. The file dimension of this web page is far bigger than the dimensions of the web page we examined on the location utilizing the light-weight theme, and the design is extra superior.
Within the earlier exams, we set K6 to regularly enhance the variety of digital customers to 99. Nevertheless, this quantity was too excessive for the Bluehost web site utilizing the heavyweight theme. Subsequently, the utmost variety of digital customers was lowered to 14 for this check.
Because the chart under exhibits, the location hosted by Bluehost with Avada put in was solely in a position to deal with six simultaneous digital customers earlier than the response time reached two seconds. Even with one digital person accessing the location, the response time was over one second, and by the point 14 had been, it had reached an unacceptable seven seconds.
SiteGround did a a lot better job of internet hosting the location utilizing the heavyweight theme on this check, and even with 99 digital customers accessing it on the identical time, the response time was a quick 326 milliseconds.
This greater degree of efficiency from SiteGround could possibly be attributed to their determination to host their shoppers’ websites on the Google Cloud platform.
Bluehost vs SiteGround Load Dealing with Check Abstract
As our load dealing with exams present, in case you plan to make use of a light-weight theme and publish content material consisting primarily of textual content and some optimized photographs, it shouldn’t matter whether or not you select Bluehost or SiteGround when it comes to what number of simultaneous guests your web site can accommodate.
Nevertheless, in case you’d quite use a extra resource-hungry theme and publish content material that options movies and a number of photographs, then solely SiteGround seems able to delivering a passable person expertise to your viewers.
SiteGround vs Bluehost Uptime Monitoring
For our closing efficiency check, we used Pingdom to observe the uptime of our 4 check websites.
Because the above chart exhibits, neither the 2 websites hosted by Bluehost nor the 2 hosted by SiteGround skilled any downtime through the seven days of monitoring.
Bluehost vs SiteGround Technical Particulars
The above content material covers the principle options of the Bluehost and SiteGround shared internet hosting plans.
Nevertheless, for these in search of extra data earlier than making a call, listed here are another particulars that you just may discover helpful, in addition to an summary of a few of the key factors, already talked about:
- Web site caching: Bluehost makes use of the in-house Endurance Cache service which has three ranges of caching. SiteGround has its personal SG Optimizer plugin that permits you to cache and optimize your web site in many alternative methods.
- Content material Supply Community (CDN): Each Bluehost and SiteGround help simple integration with the free and paid Cloudflare plans in addition to integration with different CDNs.
- PHP: With each hosts, you possibly can select from a variety of PHP variations between 7.Zero and seven.Four by way of an online interface, with SiteGround additionally providing model 5.4.
- HTTP/2.0: HTTP/2.Zero is enabled on the Bluehost and SiteGround shared plans.
- SSL: You may apply a free Let’s Encrypt SSL certificates, import your individual certificates, or buy a unique certificates by way of each hosts.
- SFTP: Each hosts allow you to create a number of Safe FTP accounts to entry your webspace for importing and enhancing information.
- Server file supervisor: You may entry your server area by way of a browser-based file supervisor accessed with Bluehost and SiteGround.
- Database entry: Each hosts provide the skill to entry the WordPress database by way of phpMyAdmin by way of a browser.
- E mail service: There’s an e-mail service on the Bluehost and SiteGround shared internet hosting plans, together with webmail, POP3, and SMTP.
- WordPress web site administration: Elective computerized WordPress software program and plugin updates with Bluehost and necessary WordPress software program updates and non-obligatory plugin updates with SiteGround.
- Plugin restrictions: No checklist of disallowed plugins with both Bluehost or SiteGround, in contrast to some managed WordPress hosts.
- Safety measures: Bluehost have SiteLock and SiteGround have SG Website Scanner paid add-ons that embrace every day malware scans, computerized malware removing, and extra safety features.
- Put up-hack clean-up providers: Bluehost don’t have a service to repair websites which have been hacked, though the non-obligatory paid SiteLock add-on may also help with this. SiteGround gained’t assist to scrub up your web site if it will get hacked however advocate Sucuri.
- Knowledge middle places: Bluehost solely has one knowledge middle which is situated in Utah, Western USA. SiteGround has six knowledge facilities on three continents and makes use of the Google Cloud platform as a part of its infrastructure.
- Staging websites: Each the Bluehost and SiteGround shared plans embrace entry to a staging instrument.
- WordPress web site migration: Bluehost will migrate one WordPress web site free of charge, whereas SiteGround cost a price but additionally have a free-to-use migration plugin.
- Uptime checks and assure: Each hosts monitor their servers for downtime however not particular person buyer web sites. SiteGround assure community uptime of 99.9% and can present free internet hosting within the case of downtime; nonetheless, Bluehost, in contrast to many different internet hosts, don’t have an uptime assure.
- Help channels: Each hosts provide 24/7 help by way of phone and reside chat, with SiteGround additionally offering help by way of e-mail ticketing.
Each Bluehost and SiteGround make it very simple to enroll, begin a brand new web site, and create an internet presence.
Nevertheless, as our exams present, you do get higher efficiency from SiteGround when it comes to how briskly your web site will load. Additionally, in case you plan to make use of a feature-rich multipurpose theme like Avada and import considered one of its demos, internet hosting it with SiteGround means it won’t solely load comparatively rapidly, however it’s going to additionally be capable of deal with many extra guests accessing it on the identical time.
However, the Bluehost plans are way more reasonably priced. Trying on the entry-level plans from each hosts, you pay nearly twice as a lot per thirty days whenever you enroll with SiteGround.
Nevertheless, as web site velocity is so essential for conserving your guests completely satisfied and driving conversions, in case you can afford to enroll with SiteGround, it’s the really helpful possibility from this comparability.
If you happen to can’t justify the upper costs of SiteGround although, Bluehost might nonetheless be just right for you. Nevertheless, you’d should ensure you select a quick WordPress theme, maintain your content material effectively optimized, and maybe set up some third-party plugins to try to enhance web site velocity.
Based mostly on this comparability, and our different internet hosting opinions, SiteGround are the quickest shared host we’ve examined. If you happen to can afford their costs, you’ll be having access to a well-designed buyer portal, a helpful set of options, and spectacular efficiency for shared internet hosting.
Used/utilizing both Bluehost or SiteGround? Ideas on every?